Showing posts with label Recommended by us. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recommended by us. Show all posts

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Recommended by us: Time to move on?



''Cosmology and particle physics have long been dominated by theoretical paradigms: Einstein's general theory of relativity in cosmology and the Standard Model of particle physics. The time may have come for paradigm shifts. Does cosmological inflation require a modification of Einstein's gravity? Have experiments at the LHC discovered a new particle beyond the Standard Model? It is premature to answer these questions, but we theorists can dream about the possibilities.''
 

Full conference proceeding  here.

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Recommended by us: Science Pie - A podcast about physics, history, literature and much more

Dennis Schulz, a physics student, and Annika Brockschmidt, a history and German student, are two podcast enthusiasts based in Heidelberg (Germany).

They created the independent podcast Science Pie, focussing on the variety of subjects science can offer. Their topics range from history to physics, from literature to engineering, in particular interdisciplinary work - a range of topics hard to find in the jungle of podcasts. They often use interviews with an involved researcher or professor as a base for the episodes.
And all of this is provided in a bilingual version (English/German) and a special care for details.

Dennis and Annika’s podcast successfully meets the effort of joining science curiosities, interesting stories about people and a collection of knowledge and facts on history, literature and myths. Join them and enjoy!


Friday, November 20, 2015

Recommended by us: Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity postulates explained by a teenager

""
Eighteen-year-old student Ryan Chester has just won US$400,000 for this video explaining Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity as part of the inaugural Breakthrough Junior Challenge - an international competition that aims to inspire the next generation of scientists and science communicators. And it’s not hard to see why. If you heard the words, "Einstein’s Special Theory of--" and tuned out because it’s all too hard, we have a feeling Ryan will change your mind.



 Original Sciencealert article here

""

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Recommended by us: A Cosmic Quest for Dark Matter

In the following I attached an article appeared two days ago in The Wall Street Journal about the DarkSide-50 experiment located in the Gran Sasso National Laboratory, in which I am deeply involved since I am a member of the collaboration. I was there in those days and for this reason I know also some funny behind the scenes :)

By the way, I was lucky enough to see even more snow than that you see at the beginning of the video, thanks to a big snow storm that happened just a day after the realization of the following interview.
I have attached also some pictures of my stay during the DarkSide General meeting.

Enjoy the read!








A Cosmic Quest for Dark Matter 

Scientists are hunting one of the biggest prizes in physics: tiny particles called wimps that could unlock some of the universe’s oldest secrets

By GAUTAM NAIK
Feb. 13, 2015 1:32 pm E.T.



A mile under Italy's Gran Sasso mountain, scientists are seeking one of the smallest objects in the universeand one of the most biggest prizes in physics: a wimp.

A wimp—a weakly interacting massive particle—is thought to be the stuff of dark matter, an invisible substance that makes up about a quarter of the universe but has never been seen by humans.

Gravity is the force that holds things together, and the vast majority of it emanates from dark matter. Ever since the big bang, this mystery material has been the universe’s prime architect, giving it shape and structure. Without dark matter, there would be no galaxies, no stars, no planets. Solving its mystery is crucial to understanding what the universe is made of.


Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Recommended by us: Interview with John Ellis



To come across John Ellis at CERN is actually not a rare event: at seminars, at coffee breaks... But probably in those situations you do not have so much courage or time to ask him what is his position about the role of science in the society, or even more when he decided to become a theoretical physicist!

If you have a kind of curiosity about these topics and other related questions, take a look at this interview: past CERN Summer Students with the kind help of the PH Newsletter have had the fortune to ask to him directly

http://ph-news.web.cern.ch/content/interview-john-ellis


Have a good read and, if you will have the patience to go until the end, you will find a final question to you.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Pull back: "Scientist: Four golden lessons" by Steven Weinberg

Just came across this brilliant essay by Nobel Laureate Steven Weinberg, writing about his experience as a young scholar, his first steps in research and the connection between science and epistemology.



The essay is so short and clear that I could have copied it here in its entirety, but I'll just give you one inspirational paragraph:

[...]
Look back 100 years, to 1903. How important is it now who was Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the United States? What stands out as really important is that at McGill University, Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were working out the nature of radioactivity. This work (of course!) had practical applications, but much more important were its cultural implications. 
[...]

and leave the rest for the original

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Recommended by us: "Is BICEP wrong?"

“ 

Blockbuster Big Bang Result May Fizzle, Rumor Suggests


The biggest discovery in cosmology in a decade could turn out to be an experimental artifact—at least according to an Internet rumor. The team that reported the discovery is sticking by its work, however.
Eight weeks ago, researchers working with a specialized telescope at the South Pole reported the observation of pinwheel-like swirls in the polarization of the afterglow of the big bang, or cosmic microwave background (CMB). Those swirls are traces of gravitational waves rippling through the fabric of spacetime a sliver of a second after the big bang, argue researchers working with the Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization 2 (BICEP2) telescope. Such waves fulfilled a prediction of a wild theory called inflation, which says that in the first 10-32 seconds, the universe underwent a mind-boggling exponential growth spurt. Many scientists hailed the result as a "smoking gun" for inflation.
However, scientists cautioned that the result would have to be scrutinized thoroughly. And now a potential problem with the BICEP analysis has emerged, says Adam Falkowski, a theoretical particle physicist at the Laboratory of Theoretical Physics of Orsay in France and author of the Résonaances blog. The BICEP researchers mapped the polarization of the CMB across a patch of sky measuring 15° by 60°. To study the CMB signal, however, they first had to subtract the "foreground" of microwaves generated by dust within our galaxy, and the BICEP team may have done that incorrectly, Falkowski reports on his blog today.
To subtract the galactic foreground, BICEP researchers relied on a particular map of it generated by the European Space Agency's spacecraft Planck, which mapped the CMB across the entire sky from 2009 until last year. However, the BICEP team apparently interpreted the map as showing only the galactic emissions. In reality, it may also contain the largely unpolarized hazy glow from other galaxies, which has the effect of making the galactic microwaves coming from any particular point of the sky look less thoroughly polarized than they actually are. So using the map to strip out the galactic foreground may actually leave some of that foreground in the data where it could produce a spurious signal, Falkowski explains. "Apparently, there is something that needs to be corrected, so at this point the BICEP result cannot be taken at face value," he tells Science.
Continue to read on Science 



                                                                                                                                                                                          
See also http://resonaances.blogspot.fr/2014/05/is-bicep-wrong.html
     

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Recommended by us: "MicroBooNE, in 3-D"

Tingjun Yang (left) and Wesley Ketchum lead the effort to develop new 3-D reconstruction 
software for the MicroBooNE experiment. Here they stand inside the MicroBooNE 
time projection chamber.Photo: Reidar Hahn

“ 
Imagine your job is to analyze the data coming from Fermilab's MicroBooNE experiment. 

It wouldn't be an easy task. MicroBooNE has been designed specifically to follow up on the MiniBooNE experiment, which may have seen hints of a fourth type of neutrino, one that does not interact with matter in the same way as the three types we know about. The big clue to the possible existence of these particles is low-energy electrons.
But that experiment could not adequately separate the production of electrons from the production of photons, which would not indicate a new particle. MicroBooNE's detector, an 89-ton active volume liquid-argon time projection chamber, will be able to. To take advantage of this, every neutrino interaction in the chamber will have to be examined to determine if it created an electron or a photon.
And there will be a lot of interactions to study — the MicroBooNE collaboration expects to see activity in their detector once every 20 seconds, including nearly 150 neutrino interactions each day.
If all goes to plan, human operators won't have to worry about any of that. When MicroBooNE switches on next summer, it will sport one of the most sophisticated 3-D reconstruction software programs ever designed for a neutrino experiment.
According to Wesley Ketchum and Tingjun Yang, two postdocs leading the software development team at Fermilab, MicroBooNE's computers will be able to accurately reconstruct neutrino interactions and automatically filter the ones that create electrons. The key to accomplishing this lies in the design of the time projection chamber.


Continue to read on Fermilab Today 



                                                                                                                                                                                               

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

[Recommended by us] Why Hot Water Freezes Faster Than Cold—Physicists Solve the Mpemba Effect

Aristotle first noticed that hot water freezes faster than cold, but chemists have always struggled to explain the paradox. Until now.

Water may be one of the most abundant compounds on Earth, but it is also one of more mysterious. For example, like most liquids it becomes denser as it cools. But unlike them, it reaches a state of maximum density at 4°C and then becomes less dense before it freezes.

In solid form, it is less dense still, which is why standard ice floats on water. That’s one reason why life on Earth has flourished— if ice were denser than water, lakes and oceans would freeze from the bottom up, almost certainly preventing the kind of chemistry that makes life possible.

Then there is the strange Mpemba effect, named after a Tanzanian student who discovered that a hot ice cream mix freezes faster than a cold mix in cookery classes in the early 1960s. (In fact, the effect has been noted by many scientists throughout history including Aristotle, Francis Bacon and René Descartes.)

The Mpemba effect is the observation that warm water freezes more quickly than cold water. The effect has been measured on many occasions with many explanations put forward. One idea is that warm containers make better thermal contact with a refrigerator and so conduct heat more efficiently. Hence the faster freezing. Another is that warm water evaporates rapidly and since this is an endothermic process, it cools the water making it freeze more quickly.



None of these explanations are entirely convincing, which is why the true explanation is still up for grabs.

Today Xi Zhang at the Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and a few pals provide one. These guys say that the Mpemba paradox is the result of the unique properties of the different bonds that hold water together.

What’s so odd about the bonds in water? Discover it HERE.

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Monday, August 26, 2013

Recommended by us: "The EMC effect still puzzles after 30 years"


Thirty years ago, high-energy muons at CERN revealed the first hints of an effect that puzzles experimentalists and theorists alike to this day.



Contrary to the stereotype, advances in science are not typically about shouting "Eureka!". Instead, they are about results that make a researcher say, "That’s strange". This is what happened 30 years ago when the European Muon collaboration (EMC) at CERN looked at the ratio of their data on per-nucleon deep-inelastic muon scattering off iron and compared it with that of the much smaller nucleus of deuterium.
The data were plotted as a function of Bjorken-x, which in deep-inelastic scattering is interpreted as the fraction of the nucleon’s momentum carried by the struck quark. The binding energies of nucleons in the nucleus are several orders of magnitude smaller than the momentum transfers of deep-inelastic scattering, so, naively, such a ratio should be unity except for small corrections for the Fermi motion of nucleons in the nucleus. What the EMC experiment discovered was an unexpected downwards slope to the ratio (figure 1) – as revealed in CERN Courier in November 1982 and then published in a refereed journal the following March (Aubertet al. 1983).

Continue to read on Cern Courier

                                                                                                                                                                                               

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Recommended by us: "Sterile-neutrino hunt gathers pace at Gran Sasso"

The Borexino detector at Gran Sasso: the SOX experiment will soon be using it to look for sterile neutrinos. (Courtesy: Borexino collaboration)
 
Much-debated results suggesting the existence of a fourth kind of neutrino, described as sterile, are to be put to the test in a new experiment under Italy's Gran Sasso mountain. The physicists who have devised the experiment say that by using an existing solar-neutrino detector they can carry out an inexpensive yet thorough search for the hypothetical sterile neutrino.
Neutrinos are chargeless, almost massless subatomic particles that interact with ordinary matter only via the weak nuclear force. As a result they can pass through vast amounts of material undisturbed. To study them, physicists build huge detectors – the idea being that a large number of target nuclei will result in a few neutrino collisions that can be detected.
If they exist, then sterile neutrinos would be even more difficult to detect because they probably would not interact with ordinary matter at all – only with other neutrinos. They would do so via "oscillation", a well-established phenomenon in which ordinary neutrinos transform and re-transform continually from one of three flavours – electron, muon and tau – to another as they travel. Likewise, ordinary neutrinos would oscillate into sterile neutrinos and back again but probably over much shorter distances than those typical of normal neutrino oscillation.

Continue to read on http://physicsworld.com

                                                                                                                                                                                                             

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Recommended by us: "Scientists: Do Outreach or Your Science Dies"

 


Scientists, here’s the bottom line. If you don’t convince the public that your science matters, your funding will quickly vanish and so will your field. Put another way, the era of outreach being optional for scientists is now over.

( Continue to read on Scientific American)

                 ”

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Recommended by us:"First evidence for extraterrestrial sources of high-energy neutrinos"


IceCube Neutrino Observatory reports first evidence for extraterrestrial sources of high-energy neutrinos


A massive telescope in the Antarctic ice reports the detection of 28 extremely high-energy neutrinos that might have their origin in cosmic sources. Two of these reached energies greater than 1 petaelectronvolt (PeV), an energy level thousands of times higher than the highest energy neutrino yet produced in a manmade accelerator.
Photo: Francis Halzen
Francis Halzen

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory, run by an international collaboration and headquartered at the Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center (WIPAC) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, identified the neutrinos, which were described today (May 15) in a talk at the IceCube Particle Astrophysics Symposium at UW–Madison.
“We’re looking for the first time at high energy neutrinos that are not coming from the atmosphere,” says Francis Halzen, principal investigator of IceCube and the Hilldale and Gregory Breit Distinguished Professor of Physics at UW–Madison. “This is what we were looking for,” he adds. “I would never have imagined that the science would be more exciting than building this instrument.”


                                   

(Continue to read on www.news.wisc.edu)
                 ”

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Recommended by us:"IBM Research Makes World’s Smallest Movie Using Atoms"


Future storage systems based on atomic-scale memory would be capable of storing massive amounts of Big Data
GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS® certifies movie as World's Smallest Stop-Motion Film


AN JOSE, Calif. - 01 May 2013: Scientists from IBM (NYSE: IBM) today unveiled the world’s smallest movie, made with one of the tiniest elements in the universe: atoms. Named “A Boy and His Atom,” the GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS -verified movie used thousands of precisely placed atoms to create nearly 250 frames of stop-motion action.



”A Boy and His Atom” depicts a character named Atom who befriends a single atom and goes on a playful journey that includes dancing, playing catch and bouncing on a trampoline. Set to a playful musical track, the movie represents a unique way to convey science outside the research community.  
“Capturing, positioning and shaping atoms to create an original motion picture on the atomic-level is a precise science and entirely novel,” said Andreas Heinrich, Principle Investigator, IBM Research. “At IBM, researchers don’t just read about science, we do it. This movie is a fun way to share the atomic-scale world while opening up a dialogue with students and others on the new frontiers of math and science. 
Making the Movie
In order to make the movie, the atoms were moved with an IBM-invented scanning tunneling microscope.  “This Nobel Prize winning tool was the first device that enabled scientists to visualize the world all the way down to single atoms,” said Christopher Lutz, Research Scientist, IBM Research. “It weighs two tons, operates at a temperature of negative 268 degrees Celsius and magnifies the atomic surface over 100 million times. The ability to control the temperature, pressure and vibrations at exact levels makes our IBM Research lab one of the few places in the world where atoms can be moved with such precision.”  
Remotely operated on a standard computer, IBM researchers used the microscope to control a super-sharp needle along a copper surface to “feel” atoms. Only 1 nanometer away from the surface, which is a billionth of a meter in distance, the needle can physically attract atoms and molecules on the surface and thus pull them to a precisely specified location on the surface. The moving atom makes a unique sound that is critical feedback in determining how many positions it’s actually moved.  
As the movie was being created, the scientists rendered still images of the individually arranged atoms, resulting in 242 single frames.

                                          

                                                                                               (Continue to read on IBM.com )
                 ” 

Friday, April 19, 2013

Recommended by us: Un altro italiano alla guida di un esperimento di LHC


Dopo Guido Tonelli, che ha rivestito questa carica fino a tutto il 2011, un altro fisico italiano, Tiziano Camporesi, è stato eletto coordinatore internazionale dell’esperimento CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid), uno dei quattro grandi esperimenti dell'acceleratore Large Hadron Collider (LHC) del CERN di Ginevra.


Tiziano Camporesi rivestiva già la carica di vice-coordinatore dell’esperimento CMS, e da Gennaio 2014 sostituirà l’attuale spokesperson, lo statunitense Joe Incandela. CMS e ATLAS sono gli esperimenti che hanno identificato il bosone di Higgs.
Camporesi è uno dei tanti esempi della qualità della scuola italiana di fisica. Nato a Cotignola, in provincia di Ravenna, ha studiato a Bologna dove si è laureato nel 1981 con una tesi sperimentale al Cern.  Nel 1984 grazie a una borsa di post-dottorato per gli USA ha collaborato con l’esperimento Mac allo Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in California. Nel 1986, tornato in Europa con una fellowship del Cern ha fatto parte dell’esperimento DELPHI all’acceleratore Lep dove ha ricoperto vari ruoli di responsabilità fino a esserne eletto coordinatore nel 1998. Dal 1990 lavora come ricercatore al Cern.

Nel 2001 si è unito alla collaborazione CMS dove ha ricoperto ruoli di responsabilità in vari progetti (calorimetro adronico in avanti, calorimetro elettromagnetico) per poi coordinare la fase di preparazione e i primi due anni di presa dati a LHC. È autore o coautore di più di 500 articoli pubblicati su riviste internazionali e membro di vari comitati scientifici internazionali.
                  ”
Continua a leggere su LeScienze.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Recommended by us: "The role of fashion in physical theory"


From the book "The road to Reality" by Roger Penrose: 

[...] String theory is also a subject that is studied by a good many physicists, but does that make it physics? This raises the issue of fashion in fundamenta physical research. Let me begin by quoting a survey carried out by Carlo Rovelli, and reported in his address to the International Congress on General Relativity and Gravitation, held in Pune, India, in December 1997. Rovelli is one of the originators of the loop-variable approach to quantum gravity, and he claimed no professionalism in the conducting of his survey. Yet the results he found certainly reflect what my own (unsubstantiated) expectations would have been. He made a count of articles on the subject of quantum gravity published over the previous year, as recorded in the Los Angeles Archives. The rough average of papers per month, in the various approaches to the subject, came out as follows:

                      String theory: 69
                       Loop quantum gravity: 25
                    QFT in curved spaces: 8
                    Lattice approaches: 7
                    Euclidean quantum gravity: 3
                   Non-commutative geometry: 3
                                                                           Quantum cosmology: 1
                                                                           Twistors: 1
                                                                           Others: 6

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Backreation on "Black holes and the Planck length"

 
According to Special Relativity, an object in motion relative to you appears shortened. The faster it is, the shorter it appears. This is effect known as Lorentz-contraction. According to General Relativity, an object that has a sufficiently high mass-density in a small volume collapses to a black hole. Does this mean that if a particle moves fast enough relative to you it turns into a black hole? No, it doesn't. But it's a confusion I've come across frequently.

(Read on http://backreaction.blogspot.com/)

                 ”

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Per Pasqua arriva il "terzo" neutrino trasformista...


La collaborazione internazionale OPERA ai Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso ha osservato per la terza volta un neutrino “tau”. Si tratta di un neutrino partito dal CERN come neutrino di sapore muonico che, nel percorrere i 730 chilometri che separano Ginevra dai LNGS, ha cambiato “sapore” trasformandosi in neutrino di tipo tau. Un evento rarissimo che conferma le precedenti osservazioni del 2012 e 2010 e che comporta la prova del fenomeno dell’oscillazione del neutrino per cui è stato concepito, nel 2001, il gigantesco rivelatore OPERA orientato in direzione del CERN dove un fascio di neutrini muonici viene prodotto in direzione dei LNGS. OPERA cerca i neutrini tau sapendo che in partenza dal CERN i neutrini sono tutti muonici. Trovare neutrini di un altro sapore comporta la prova dell’esistenza dell’oscillazione durante i 730 chilometri di viaggio. Questi nuovi dati vengono presentati oggi ai LNGS nell’ambito del seminario “New results of the OPERA experiment”.

Notizia pubblicata dell'Ufficio Comunicazione INFN. Fonte: http://www.infn.it/
 ”