Showing posts with label gravity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gravity. Show all posts

Friday, June 16, 2017

New Frontiers in Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics @ Sapienza

The workshop "New Frontiers in Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics" that will be held at Sapienza starting from next Monday.

Copyright: Michelangelo feat. coalescence

The list of speakers is impressive, the workshop will bring together leading experts in gravitational-wave astrophysics (the location surely helped attracting a lot of participants!), with the aim of discussing new frontiers, such as formation of black-hole binaries, multiwavelength and multimessenger astronomy, tests of gravity, neutron-star modelling and equation-of-state extraction from gravitational-wave signals.


Today, Valeria Ferrari, Leonardo Gualtieri and I are finally done with the organization, and I finally deserve this:

June in Rome & fresh beer, it could be worse....

Stay tuned for some news about the workshop later this week!


Friday, March 17, 2017

Can exotic compact objects exist?

Spring is coming, restoring from hibernation, sorry for the long silence on this blog!

This week we have put a new paper out on the arXiv: Exotic Compact Objects and How to Quench their Ergoregion Instability, which is essentially the outcome of my student Elisa Maggio's master thesis, so I thought that summarizing our results was a good excuse to restart this blog.

Exotic compact objects (ECOs) is just a catchy name for several models that have been proposed as alternative to black holes. Black holes are the natural outcome of the gravitational collapse in classical general relativity, but a growing number of theoretical physicists is uneasy with some potential drawbacks associated with them, in particular with the consequences of forming an event horizon as the final state of the stellar collapse.

According to these arguments, the classical picture of black holes would be at clash with quantum mechanics, even for astrophysical objects for which, in principle, quantum corrections are expected to be small. Some of the potential problems include the famous information loss paradox, the recent firewall proposal, the huge entropy of a black hole, and the singularity that lurks in its interior, where general relativity has to break down. There is no general consensus on whether or not these are serious problems that should be addressed in the context of classical gravity, but a growing community of theoreticians is looking for alternatives.

In brief, models of ECOs aim at reproducing all properties of compact dark objects that we observe (namely, a radius very close to the Schwarzschild radius and an arbitrarily large mass) and the theoretical properties (stability, formation as the end state of physical astrophysical processes,...) that characterize the black hole dynamics but without having an event horizon nor a singularity. So far, none of the ECO models on the market succeeded in reproducing all these properties, which is already a strong result in support of the black hole picture. But we know that theoreticians are stubborn and they keep trying.

At the theoretical level, a possible problem with ECOs is the so-called ergoregion instability, an instability that develops in compact objects which are spinning fast and that, unlike a Kerr black hole, do not have a horizon. In this paper, we showed two things:

a) The instability is rather generic and quite strong when the ECO has a surface that does not absorb any radiation (like a perfectly reflecting mirror). Although apparently unrealistic, some quantum-gravity models predict precisely this situation, and might be ruled out by this effect.

b) If the ECO can absorb a fraction of the radiation in its interior (for example by converting it in heat and thermalizing the perturbation), then it is possible to quench the instability. Whether this makes the model viable or not depends on two crucial issues, that we don't address in the paper: a) Are there ECO models that absorb enough radiation to quench the instability? b) What's the final state of the instability?

It is likely that the answer to the latter question is that an unstable ECO would simply slow down as a result of the instability, until it's not unstable anymore. In such case, one should compare theoretical models with observations of highly spinning black hole candidates, to see whether the instability is incompatible with observations.

A lot of work remains to be done but this is surely an exciting time for this kind of studies. As I write this, I'm at Frankfurt airport on my way back after having attended this workshop. I have found great interest among the participants related to the possibility of ruling out or detecting ECOs using GW observations (see also this other recent paper), which was something unimaginable just a few years ago, before the gravitational-wave revolution.

Anyway, truth is, i wrote this to have the opportunity also to share some funny pics from Elisa's graduation last December :-)

Elisa going through the wormhole, she entered as an undergrad
and emerged from the throat as a grad student ready for her PhD
From the left: Leonardo, Elisa, and Paolo celebrating Elisa's defense

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Laura and Nicola are Masters!

This week, my first two master students, Nicola Franchini and Laura Sberna, have defended their theses, and obtained a master degree (MSc in Astrophysics and in Physics, respectively) at Sapienza with maximum marks!

Nicola's thesis is entitled "Constraining Black Holes with Light Bosonic Hair Using Quasi-periodic Oscillations", whereas Laura's thesis is entitled "Early-Universe Cosmology in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity"


Little time to celebrate for them: Laura is moving to the Perimeter Institute to start a PhD with Neil Turok, whereas Nicola is already at the University of Nottingham and just started a PhD with Thomas Sotiriou.
Kudos to them and good luck!


Celebrating Laura's "laurea" in front of the Physics Building "Edificio Marconi" at Sapienza. 
Elisa (on the left) is next on the line to finish her thesis.


Saturday, September 10, 2016

NASA to rejoin forces with ESA to launch gravitational-wave space detector!

News was in the air since the LIGO discovery, but the 11th LISA symposium in Zürich made it official: after its dropout in 2011, NASA is ready to rejoin ESA in the effort to build the first gravitational-wave observatory on space. The effect of this dropout was not only to change the mission's name (from the original "LISA" to "eLISA") but also to drastically reduce its budget, resulting in a smaller apparatus and reduced science case.


The recent GW discovery has boosted this field and, after the announcement in February, it was immediately clear that the plan was to anticipate eLISA flight (initially tentatively scheduled around 2034). Now, it seems that eLISA could fly some years earlier (around 2030) and, most importantly, it will probably be build in its original LISA design, thanks to the joint effort of ESA and NASA.

eLISA is a triangular laser interferometer that will search for gravitational waves in space



After the LIGO/Virgo discovery, after the amazing success of the LISA Pathfinder, this is yet another great news for gravitational physics and science in general. Year 2016 will definitely be remembered as marking the birth of a new discipline.





Thursday, September 1, 2016

Lectures on Gravitational Waves

This and next week I will be giving a series of lectures on "Gravitational Waves" at the Escola de Astrofísica e Gravitação (EAG8) at IST (Lisbon) and at the international school Invisible16 at SISSA (Trieste), respectively. The lectures at SISSA will be also recorded.

Some material related to the lectures (references, problems and notebooks) can be found here (this is still work in progress, since I am still preparing the problems and the Mathematica notebooks...)


The poster of EAG8

The poster of Invisible16




Saturday, July 23, 2016

GR21 @ Columbia + Workshop @ Caltech

In academia, summer is the period to attend conferences and workshops, since the term is over (typically between May and June, depending on the country) and researchers do not have teaching duties at this time. 

This year I attended the GR21 Conference at Columbia University in NYC, the biggest event (organized every 3 years) that brings together scientists working in all aspects of General Relativity. 

I was not super happy with attending this conference, since the conference fee (~$600) and the cost of staying in NYC were much higher than usual (GR20 was held in Warsaw and conference fee was about half the price). However, in this very special and exciting year for General Relativity, I couldn't miss this conference. Attending it, in fact, turned out to be a very good choice: the conference was great, I had the chance to discuss with a lot of colleagues and I've particularly enjoyed the talks at the parallel sessions. I gave two talks, one presenting the recent work discussed here at the Special Gravitational Wave Session, and another on tidal deformations at the Parallel Session on Perturbation Theory in General Relativity. 

The slides of my talks are available here and here, respectively, whereas some nice pics from the event can be found here; I'm not in any of them, though, so I took this one myself:

Heading to the morning plenary session (hence the sleepy face) at Columbia campus
The GR conferences are organized by The International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation, ISGRG. During the GR21 conference, Prof. Eric Poisson was elected new President of ISGRG and the venue for GR22 in 2019 was decided (it's going to be in Valencia).


After the conference, I went to Boston for a short visit and then flew to LA to attend the workshop "Unifying Tests of General Relativity", organized by Leo Stein and other members of the Caltech in Pasadena, CA.

After a conference like GR21 (where one passes most of the time scattering off the 600+ participants, chatting and discussing projects for which one usually doesn't even have the time to sit down and think about) attending a small workshop (~40 participants, most of which friends and long-standing colleagues) like the one at Caltech was really a relief. I've never been on the West Coast and Pasadena is a lovely town, everyone seems relaxed and I had time to sit down and talk to collaborators I usually see in person just a few times per year. Science-wise, the workshop was excellent in many aspects, and I left Caltech really excited and looking forwards to working again on some new projects (if any, this is probably the best outcome of a successful workshop!) Some pictures of the event can be found here and below:

Group photo next to the Keck Center at Caltech

Me discussing with Nico Yunes and Vitor Cardoso about our recent work on GW ringdown

I managed to break my glasses on the very first day of the workshop. The secretary was a a DIY-type lady and helped me fixing them. 
This was the result.... [pic taken by Thomas Sotiriou]


Thursday, July 21, 2016

Richard Brito's got a PhD!

Richard Brito (IST, Lisbon) successfully defended his PhD thesis, entitled "Fundamental fields around compact objects: Massive spin-2 fields, Superradiant instabilities and Stars with dark matter cores" with Vitor Cardoso and myself as supervisor and co-supervisor, respectively.

Richard was awarded a PhD with Distinction and Honours (the jury members were Eugeny Babichev, Carlos Herdeiro, José Lemos and José Natário) and is now moving to the Albert Einstein Institute in Potsdam as a postdoctoral fellow. Kudos Richard!



Richard Brito right after his PhD thesis defense, with supervisor Vitor Cardoso and jury members (from the left: Carlos Herdeiro, Eugeny Babichev, Vitor, Richard, Jose' Lemos, Jose' Natario)

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Second detection of gravitational waves from a binary coalescence

Breaking news are all around the globe after yesterday's press conference by the LIGO/Virgo collaboration, which announced a second very solid gravitational-wave event on Boxing Day, Dec 26 2015, dubbed GW151226.

The waveforms of the 3 events detected by LIGO during O1 (the first observation run). GW150914 and GW151226 are events which are very solidly detected (at more than 5 sigma), whereas LVT151012 has a (small) probability of being a statistical fluctuation. From this page. The inspiral phase of the new event GW151226 lasted much longer than the original GW150914 (about 80 cycles in total)

I warmly suggest you to check this beautiful multimedia page, made by Marc Favata and his group.

As the LIGO/Virgo collaboration put it, the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics is officially started!


Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Can one hear the shape of a black hole? [*]

[Edit: see also the Synopsis in APS Magazine "Physics", the coverage and this interview (in Italian) by the Italian Institute for Astrophysics (INAF), and the stories in Physics World, NewScientist, Phys.org, Le Monde and Repubblica.]


An orchestra conductor can easily tell a gong from a bell just by their different sound. Can astronomers do the same and tell a black hole from another dark object just by detecting their different gravitational-wave signal? In our recent paper, Vitor Cardoso, Edgardo Franzin and I show that this might not be the case [preprint here].


Last February, the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration announced the first direct detection of gravitational waves by the two laser interferometers advanced LIGO. This historical discovery has been also welcomed as the first conclusive proof for the existence of black holes, the most extreme objects in the Universe. The detected signal --dubbed GW150914-- corresponds to the "pas de deux" of two massive objects, which inspiral around each other and eventually collide in a cosmic spacetime-quake. LIGO data firmly show that the two objects are extremely compact and way too massive to be neutron stars. While providing compelling evidence, this does not represent a bullet-proof confirmation of the existence of black holes by itself. After all, signatures of compact, dark and massive objects come routinely from electromagnetic observations with infrared and X-ray detectors.

What makes GW150914 really unique is that the gravitational-wave signal contains all the final stages of the cosmic evolution of the binary system: the two objects lose an enormous amount of energy through the emission of gravitational waves, approach each other and eventually merge to form a single compact object of about 62 solar masses. After the merger (which lasted only a few milliseconds!) the final object was highly distorted and underwent an adjustment phase known as the "ringdown", in which the object vibrates pretty much like a drum. Just like the notes of the drum depend on its properties (the shape, the size, the material), the "ringdown modes" should carry information about the very nature of the final object produced after the merger.

A comparison between the ringdown signal of a particle falling into a black hole (black dashed line) and the same particle falling into a wormhole (red line). The wormhole geometry is illustrated in the top right corner. The two signals are identical at early times and the "universal" ringdown waveform is associated to the particle reaching point "A" (the light ring). The real quasinormal modes of the wormhole appear only at late times, when the particle reaches the throat (point "B").


Black holes are snatches in the spacetime fabric and their rim ---known as the event horizon--- vibrates in a very peculiar way that was predicted after decades of restless work by using Einstein's theory of general relativity. Scientists hope that, by detecting events like GW150914, one would be able to identify the modes of vibration of the final black hole (the so-called "quasinormal modes") from the ringdown signal. Detecting the quasinormal modes will be the definitive proof that black holes are produced in a binary merger, precisely as predicted by Einstein's theory.


In our recent work (selected as an Editor's Suggestion and featuring the cover of the current issue of Physical Review Letters), we show that this paradigm is incorrect. The vibrations of very compact objects without an event horizon are dramatically different from those of black holes (their frequency is lower and they last much longer time) and, nonetheless, the ringdown signal produced by these "black-hole mimickers" is identical to that of a black hole.


Thursday, February 11, 2016

Hey Grandma look: I finally study something that exists!

So much has been already written about today's announcement of the first direct discovery of the gravitational waves from two merging black holes by the advanced LIGO detector. Some examples:

[1], [2], [3] (this beautiful piece by my friend and colleague Emanuele Berti)

In Italian press: [1], [2], [3]

Exactly 100 years ago, Albert Einstein proved that his theory of gravity, General Relativity, predicted the existence of gravitational waves.


This is nothing but one of the most outstanding historic discoveries in science. However, since you can find much deeper posts on this topic, here are some random, not-so-serious, thoughts hastily written down while watching today's live streaming announcement (sorry for typos, this is written on the wings):

1) Look Grandma: I finally study something that exists!
[Last time someone told my grandma that maybe black holes didn't exist after all.. she literally cried!]

2) Wow, my field of research has finally become mainstream! [is this good of bad? Anyway, the largest lecture hall at the Physics Department at Sapienza was full 30 mins before the live streaming..that's pretty uncommon for something related to gravity...]

3) The first direct detection of gravitational waves is really great, but what is emitting these waves is even more interesting: these are two black holes orbiting each other, loosing energy through gravitational-wave emission and finally merging to form a final big black hole. All of this is beautifully predicted by Einstein's theory of General Relativity and required several decades of theoretical, experimental and computational work.

4) Now everyone claims they have predicted that the signal from a binary black hole merger would have been detected. Truth is, just 6 months ago nobody would have bet on this particular source.

5) Related to this, isn't it amazing how physics works? It takes just a single observation to completely change the paradigm that theorists have built over decades. Just 6 months ago very few people would have predict that LIGO -even in the case of a detection- would have been able to test General Relativity or just to make some science or astrophysics out of this discovery. Well, judging from the result of the paper published today (and the companion papers to come) this expectation was completely wrong.

6) Finally, my bets for the Nobel Prize (in random order)

Rainer Weiss, one of the founders of LIGO

Roy Kerr, who discovered the unique solution of General Relativity describing a spinning black hole

Kip Thorne, one of the cofounders of LIGO, and of the fathers of modern General Relativity
(plus one of the creator of the movie Interstellar)

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Vitor Cardoso's and Thomas Sotiriou's visits @Sapienza

In the last two months we had two guests at our Department:



Group picture taken [1] after a goodbye social dinner in the historical center of Rome. 
From the left to the right: Leonardo, Thomas, Vitor, Paolo, Ana and Leonardo Macelloni (an old friend from the University of Mississippi who I met at the time of my first moka machine)


[1] By chance, this picture was taken by the bodyguard of President of the Senate Renato Schifani, who was passing by while we were looking for a random photographer.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Summer Reading

Last year was "Fifty shades of Grey". This summer --no matter if you are sunbathing, hiking or enjoying desolated cities-- if you start pondering about black holes, superradiance, and related subjects, we got you covered:

The book will be soon available on the Springer webpage and on Amazon. Hurry up to buy a copy containing the typo in Vitor's name before they fix it. Those copies will be priceless hundred years from now :)

The book will be available in August but can be already pre-ordered. It costs $60 in the U.S. and about 45 Euros in Europe and the authors get about the 10% of the profit. This means that each of the authors (Richard, "Victor" and I) will get about 3 Euros for each sold copy. Taking "50 shades of Grey" as a reference, a back-of-the-envelope estimate suggests we might become rich in ~10^9 years.

Monday, January 26, 2015

The Century of Strong Gravity

The following is a popular science article that Richard, Vitor and I have written for the IST Physics Magazine "Pulsar" (here is the Facebook page) and that will also appear in the Portuguese Physics Magazine "Gazeta de Fisica". A pdf version is available here (in English), and here (in Portuguese).





1. One Hundred Years of Gravity

The latest Christopher Nolan's movie, Interstellar, is about a future human civilization able to undertake cosmic travels to black holes using special shortcuts, ``wormholes''. Science-fiction as it might seem, Interstellar screenplayers --who happen to be the Nolan brothers-- have worked side by side with Kip Thorne, a professor of Theoretical Physics at the California Institute of Technology and one of the fathers of modern General Relativity, the theory that explains what wormholes and black holes are and how they form in the Universe.

Thorne's contribution is to ensure that the movie --starring Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway among others-- doesn't contain scenes that would make Albert Einstein cringe.
Does this mean that travel agencies are about to sell (roundtrip!) tickets to a black hole? Not quite, but in a few years from now, theoretical physicists and astronomers will be able to study them as never before. The scientific payoff of these studies will largely overcome Interstellar's box-office, with all due respect to Mr. Nolan!


Sunday, January 4, 2015

Workshop: "Compact Objects as Astrophysical and Gravitational Probes" at the Lorentz Center (Feb 2-6, 2015)

It's a pleasure to advertise the workshop  "Compact Objects as Astrophysical and Gravitational Probes", to be held at the Lorentz Center (Leiden, The Netherlands) from February 2 through February 6.

One version of the workshop's poster, the official one will soon appear in the official webpage.
Here young Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and Albert Einstein are looking towards the most urgent questions in relativistic astrophysics, a field that has essentially emerged from their seminal works. The two young guys respectively symbolize the astrophysical and the general-relativistic communities that will gather together at this workshop, to share expertize and try to fill the gap between them
.
Last June, Enrico Barausse (at the Institut Astrophysique de Paris), Tamara Bogdanovic (at Georgia Tech in Atlanta), Vitor Cardoso (at CENTRA - Instituto Superior Tecnico in Lisbon) and Elena Maria Rossi (at Leiden University in the Netherlands) and myself have applied to an international call at the Lorentz Center to organize a workshop. We initially had in mind a small-size workshop with ~20 participants, but the proposal was selected for a large-size event. Thus, in less than one month, more than 50 world-leading experts in relativistic astrophysics will gather together in what will hopefully be a fruitful and exciting meeting (here is the program and at list of participants).


Saturday, December 6, 2014

Pre-celeberating 2015 for 100 years of Einstein's General Relativity and maybe more...


In a few weeks we will all land in the exciting year of 2015! Many people will be celebrating New Year, as usual! (but still exciting) But, unusually, gravity physicists will be celebrating 100 years of General Relativity after Albert Einstein. 

in 2015, gravitational-wave physicists, although, may have one extra celebration to do on the top of others, which is celebrating the first direct detection of gravitational waves! Advanced version of gravitational-wave detectors will start to take data in a few month, hunting wild celestial gravitational-wave sources such as black-holes and neutron-stars. I'll write more about this here some time soon. But for now, you may check out my earlier post in Gravity Room.


Anyways, just before entering in to 2015, Princeton University has recently released The Digital Einstein Papers in an open-access website which is an awesome collection and an excellent holiday reading! All the papers are in both English and German languages.




Saturday, November 15, 2014

Interstellar

 "Honestly, Interstellar really sucks" -- this is not quite true, but I couldn't help thinking of this scene.



When I asked my spouse whether she would come to watch latest Christopher Nolan' movie Interstellar, she replied: "No way!".

"But it's about black holes.", I said.
"Exactly." - she replied.

"But Kip Thorne, a world-famous physicist, was involved in the production.", I said.
"Even more so." - she replied.

"But the director is Christopher Nolan!", I replied.
"Indeed."

"But it's gonna be a Hollywood Blockbuster!", I continued
"Forget about it"

"But it's the movie of the year!"
"Exactly."

That was the end of the conversation. As a matter of fact, she went to watch the movie without (and even before!) me, but I guess this is normal within women logic.

Anyway, together with part of the Lisbon gang, yesterday we finally went to watch Interstellar in its iMAX curved-spacetime, relativistic glory, so now we too are entitled to talk about this movie.


Monday, March 17, 2014

BICEP2: three birds with one stone?

There is nothing like the amazing news that was announced today at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Boston to restart this blog after one-month silence. Researchers from the BICEP2 collaboration organized a press release that was supposed to be broadcast live. However, and this already tells something about the expectation mounting around the event, too many people tried to watch the streaming, the Harvard server collapsed and was unable to broadcast the event live. It was a great pity for me that I left the institute 2 days ago to come back to Lisbon, as for a couple of days I couldn't attend this historical event in person...

The BICEP2 observatory is located at the South Pole. The reward for 6-month darkness and absurd temperatures is the kind of landscape shown in this picture (not to mention the scientific reward for this recent discovery) 

So what's all this hype about? The BICEP2 collaboration detected for the first time the primordial gravitational waves produced during the first instants of the Universe, right after (meaning something like 0.000000000000000000000000000001 seconds after) the Big Bang. This is going to be a historical discovery, for at least three reasons:

1) Gravitational waves are one of the main predictions of Einstein's General Relativity and they were still waiting for a direct detection. Evidence for gravitational waves come from the inspiral of a binary system, whose orbit shrinks because of the emission of gravitational waves. Scientists have observed the shrinking of the orbit (an observation that was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993) but did not detect the emitted gravitational waves directly. Actually, not even the BICEP2 experiment detects primordial gravitational waves directly, but it can detect their effect on the CMB, which is somehow more direct (or, if you wish, less indirect) than what is now routinely done with binary pulsars. [Actually, I'm having an ongoing discussion with various colleagues about what a direct detection actually is. This discussion can easily becomes philosophical and I'd rather skip it here... I'll just tell you that this detection is definitely the most direct evidence of gravitational waves that we have so far]. Most importantly, the gravitational waves detected by BICEP2 are totally different from those emitted by neutron stars and black holes. Thus, this result can be seen as yet another confirmation of Einstein's gravity in a region which was completely unexplored to date.

2) Primordial gravitational waves need to be enormously amplified if they are to be detected at the present epoch (remember they were produced some 14 billions years ago...). Essentially, the majority of scientists believe that the only mechanism to explain such amplification is cosmological inflation. For this reason, today's results are often quoted as the first evidence for inflation, something that cosmologists and particle physicists were after since the late 70s. In very few and simple words, the theory of inflation assumes that the Universe has undergone a phase transition right after the Big Bang, in which it started expanding exponentially for an extremely short time (10^{-32} seconds). This exponential growth was predicted to explain other characteristics of the Universe that were already observed in the past, like its flatness, homogeneity and isotropy. Essentially, inflation provides a dynamical mechanism that, starting from generic initial conditions, makes the universe homogeneous and isotropic right to the level that we know observe.

3) Had enough? No, there's even more. Gravitational waves and inflation alone are not enough to explain why an experiment like BICEP2 would today detect such signal. Indeed, intrinsic with the idea of inflation is that fact that such spacetime perturbations were produced by quantum effects. The energy scale of such effects (some 10^16 GeV) is way larger than the energy currently produced in particle accelerators (and most likely larger than the energy that we could ever produce on Earth!) Therefore, the very fact that we can detect such effect and make sense of it (in fact, these results seem to favor one of the simplest theories of inflation, which was proposed back in the 80s) is already a confirmation of the quantum nature of gravity, whose fully understanding is the Holy Grail of all theoretical physics.

What's next? As one of the spokesmen of BICEP put it during the press release: "an exceptional discovery requires exceptional confirmation". Likely enough, these outstanding results could be confirmed soon by the Planck collaboration and by other experiments that are measuring the properties of the CMB. If confirmed, not only they would ease the decision for one of the next Nobel prizes in Physics, but they would immediately open a new era in cosmology, gravity and even particle physics.

One of the main results of the BICEP2 experiment [taken from bicepkeck.org]. The axis represent the "spectral index" n_s and the tensor-scalar ration, r. The blue area represents the region which is favored by the new observations. A value of r larger than zero implies emission of primordial gravitational waves. Before the results from BICEP2, scientists considered r~0.1 a quite large number and previous experiments were compatible with r=0 (that is, they did not observe any gravitational waves, although previous experiments, unlike BICEP2, were not specifically designed for this purpose). The fact that BICEP2 measured r~0.2 not only confirms the existence of gravitational waves, but it also means that inflation must have been quite strong to amplify the quantum perturbations to that level. Only some inflationary model can explain a value r~0.2. Funny enough, one of the most favored models is also one of the easiest and it was proposed in the 80s. After the Higgs bosons, Nature seems really to appreciate the simplest solutions to explain fundamental physics....
For people like me, it is really hard to go back and do our scientist-of-the-street job after such overwhelming discoveries. This is probably why I stopped working and decided to write here...

Added: this is the reaction of Andrei Linde, one of the fathers of the theory of inflation (and indeed the scientist who proposed the theory that it seems now favored by BICEP2 data):



Hilarious!

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

You can sleep soundly: we will not be devoured by a black hole

Today Público, one of the main Portuguese daily newspaper, published a very nice piece on our group in Lisbon, talking about our recent paper and the group's supercomputer Baltasar Sete-Sóis.

Overused pictorial description of a black hole #4




PS:
Why the long silence? Four (4) requests to referee received in 3 days (2 reports submitted, 2 to go), moved back to Lisbon 1 week ago, found new apartment, wrote 3 financial and scientific reports for my past fellowship, did paperwork for a new contract, prepared a talk i'm giving in 30 mins, read a Master thesis, trying to write a proposal and at the same time also trying to work (for real) and...live!